/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6396494
I'm pretty sure if you look around today, you can find some pretty good anime and manga, I can't imagine it's all that bad. We had some bad crap back in the day too, that generation wasn't immune to bad anime and manga, either. But it's highly subjective. What I don't like, you probably do.
>>6396498
Thanks anon, have some more cake. Enjoy.
>>6396525
I'm not on high horse gaijin, you are. You're the one thrashing around like a toddler who just spilled his baby bottle over the implementation of AI on a generation of animation that reused its CMYK colored, thin plastic sheets several times over to create the illusion of motion. Keyboard commando all you want, but you know it's true. What you hate, is how I just broke your rose colored glasses, by simplifying that era of animation down to recycled static images reused over, and over again. At least Disney Animation had the balls to actually CREATE something worth looking back on, and you can't dispute that. If you're going to defend animation, it had better be across the board for all animation back in the day, not just some, Japanimation.
And you're right, we are in /ic/, and I'm pyw. Maybe instead of answering back with static images, you should learn how to animate, like I've learned to draw my generation of art for fun.