/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3630508
>depth
this painting here is seemingly flat in places. her white dress seems flat, the skin as well. yet the silhouettes of the bodies and flats tell us a lot about the space in the painting, the space in the place they are placed in. you are nowhere near to managing such a well-orchestrated conundrum. in >>3623423, there is no consistency in any of the areas of the painting. in some places, you try to give depth to the bodies, then with another figure you don't do that at all. the spacial relationship of the figures is chaotic and makes no sense, they would in fact all overlap somehow. you try, but you can't manage to get there out of lack of basic understanding (like everyone in here is trying to tell you).
the landscape in the background is just "coloring in" so the canvas isn't all white. you haven't even tried to unify it with the rest of the painting. for all it's worth, it looks like you've cut off all around the painting, as there is no composition and no awareness of the edge of the canvas.

all these points explain to you in the most upfront way possible that you have a lot of things to learn and a long way to go. but i really doubt that you will proceed, giving that you believe you are a genius as it is. you are completely blinded.