/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4879636
Yes. Yes it was.
Let's get one thing straight though- "calling it out" wasn't what took nearly a whole thread to accomplish. I did that in three posts. I asked him what he was talking about, and then I called him a pedophile because it's fucking obvious that he was. See, read it. Three posts, 1.) >>4878981 2.) >>4879010 and 3.) >>4879064 and that discussion was over.
What really made this thread a shitshow was the assholes trying to run interception for that piece of shit. But for what it's worth, I'm glad it happened because it really shows what kind of people you are, and I fucking called it right down to the molecular level. I only wish I had screenshotted the post predicting what would happen. The basic gist of it was that people didn't want you faggots here because that would be an in for the real sick fucks and that you, like the furries with all the skeletons in their collective closet, would try to cover shit up and pretend it didn't happen for your own convenience. That is exactly what happened. And for now, it's enough to know that I was right and I called it, and now everyone else can see it too.

>>4038009
He has child bearing hips.
Otherwise good work.