/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>2235425
>It's the simple FACT that she's dressed like a slut or hooker. It automatically makes you respect the character less.
No, that's your autism kicking in. Even if the character was slutty, who gives a shit? That's only a negative to sexually frustrated morons who don't get play themselves.

>>2235461
Funny that you couldn't even point out the constructive criticism in this thread, since there aren't any. So you resort to green text. The most we got from the idiots in this thread is "she looks slutty" which isn't an issue unless you're triggered by sluts, which sounds like a personal problem.

>>2037924

Not really. I just don't understand the appeal. They are just like bronies in terms of having the want to sexualize shit made for kids/families.

Why not just pay attention to characters that are actually sexy by design? Like pic related. Why sexualize shit that was made for a target demographic you really aren't a part of?

>>2006621
>Long hair is a good safety style, it hides a lot of the skull's profile. A+ for borderline uglies/full uglies.

This guy gets it.