/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>2168110
My fav are ETAM CRU

stencils are 12 year old tier shit "street" art. banksy can go fuck himself. he is a talentless lack and so is everyone else doing stencils.
your hypocritical pseudo political anti consumerism message isn't an excuse for your work being utter shit.

they should rename it to streetfad because that's all it is. it's the middle class' white man wannabe rebellion against something he does not want to get rid off, just give the impression that he does because living is far too comfortable for you underage faggots.

pic related: some real art.

>>1681786
i understand why people do graffiti. all i am saying is that if it's low quality stuff(like tagging) then it shouldn't be everywhere you go. (i am repeating myself now) it makes the cities look like crap. i dont care about why they do it, if they just smear their name a million times on a wall then they can go fuck right off. if it looks like shit, it's vandalizm.
i wanna see the work of real artists and not the "work" of a 12 year old white wannabe gangster that does it for the thrill of it or because he is an attention whore or whatever. these people are scum.
same goes for wankers with stencils. at least stencils try to create an actual image.

for example look at the trainbombers from the unlike u documentary i posted earlier. they are in it for the thrill of it and the attention and that kind of stuff but they also know what they are doing. they know how to create good looking art and they risk going to prison for it by breaking into restricted areas and spraying their art on trains. they are in it for the art. they love art and they wanna get better at it.(at least most of the people in the documentary). i respect that because again, their work looks good. imo they arent making the trains look worse than they already are. taggers on the other hand are just vandalz.