/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>7164927
>bb-b-b-ut he literally said cumpetishon!
>anecdotes and shallow observations at best
>therefore a sample size of 5 people is direct evidence of how millions behave
>anything that doesn't validate my bad faith or straight up low iq argument is unrelated and is proven wrong--- because i say so!
>waaah insult and greentext bad! but not when i do it
>waaaaaag don't think you won an internet fight!!!
Absolutely fucking retarded

>>7129564
So, we aren't allowed to praise anyone if their work doesn't meet certain criteria?
On the contrary, we must shit on anyone with less than consumer-friendly art skills?
>people here are complete retards and don't understand art
Ironic statement, mr consumer.
If you were about objectivity, like you claim, you wouldn't say this retarded shit.

I can explain, elaborate and criticize about why that anon's works are worthy of praise, even if the output isn't squeaky clean average consumer friendly professional porn. Are you able to offer critique that doesn't boils down to
>uuuuhm this sucks because it isn't le pretty epic image and i don't like it
What looks like high polish work doesn't automatically mean higher quality or objectively better. And before you pull the retard card:
>uuuuhm do u mean art is subjective?
No it means you're fucking retarded and don't know shit about art.
Are we allowed to be objective about who you consider "skilled" without being forced to be more "skilled" than whoever we're criticizing? I don't think we are, given how this board reacts when you touch their e-celebrities, every single time.

Are you certain you just aren't butthurt that someone who you perceive as lower skilled, is getting a couple of compliments by one or two anons?
Would you accuse any social media poster who comments on genuine beg porn with thirsty comments as being a samefag or a troll?

Maybe AI slop would be more up your alley because it has the epic realistic rendering who JUST LOOKS LIKE A PHOTOGRAPH, since by your """objective""" logic art must replicate reality or else it's bad.

This dumb faggot seriously trying to talk about objectivity here while sucking his own dick

>>6688386
Bruh, it's alright, you already defended your honor and 76D chess'ed everyone and proved how you can outwit and outtrolls the trolls and the crabs because that's what everyone is and you hate crabs and trolls.

Bro, it's every single time with you derailing threads to turn it into personal blogs and trying to damage control every single negative thing some nobody on the internet DARES to say.

You've got a lot of free time you spend here for someone who draws as a profession.
I'm not that anon btw>>6686741
but it was obvious what he was pointing at
>Inb4 which is?
Figure it out, npc-chan.

Someone on the internet said you're a nobody, big whoop, just fucking ignore it and go back to and stay on twitter where you're surrounded by yesmen who enable your mental illness instead of samefagging drama and shitting up yet another thread, retard.
Don't expect another reply.

>>6423410
These posts will never end. It's the same fucking shitpost every thread.

>>6181525
>I myself don't know much about AI.
Stopped reading there.

>>6146562
Fucking this
>why won't it go away
>they keep feeding it (you)s
It doesn't want critiques, it wants to shit the board up.