/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6288408
dont be guillible. the same people who shill the neural network "art" tools are the same people who earlier made chat bots. not a single of these ai threads was made by human, its all automatized by bots and they use gpt3 to bump the threads once they are on page 10.

remember to sage, report and hide the threads. its no different from email spam.
>what is their goal
money. same as with NFT. they either want to be bought out by big corp like google or adobe for millions or to gain enough traction to make money by providing prompt tools as a service.

you arent replying to human, they bought 4chan passes and cycle the accounts. they even shill on boards like /v.

>>6281725
i think gesture is probably even bigger BEG trap than construction. It doesnt teach you observation, it doesnt teach you accuracy. I cant deny that doing 99999 gestures will teach you SOMETHING in the end, but oh boy it must be the least efficient way how to learn drawing.

BUT the book said it extremly clear and simple: gesture isnt something you learn by watching or reading about, not even by copying it. You learn it by DOING it only. So i cant just stop in middle of book and call it the dumbest book i have ever read about drawing (out of all three books i read), that would be unfair. I have to suffer through all of it and then make the final verdict.

I think grinding gesture is great way for anons who need 4 hours to make one sketch. I think its great for anons who hate their own works. That is cures perfectionalism. That it can help people who make too stiff pictures. That it gives you line confidence and turns sketching phase from
>where the fuck i put the line
to effortless thinking-free flow full of lines. PIC kinda related. I would never make anything like this before i drew roughtly 400 gestures. It was done in ~10 seconds (minus the text) and it oozes the soul which ai art will never have.

So yes gesture teaches/trains something in your mute right hemisphere of your brain which is mostly used in art making. But i am hard pressed to put it into words which dont involve phrases like
>near useless
>ugly
>beg trap
Nobody will ever look at your schizo scribbles and say: wow did you draw that? instead they will look at it and ask you if you are mentally well and if you dont need a hug or ssri pills.

And remember: gesture is like signature. When 9999 artists will make gesture of sitting man, with some struggle anyone should be able to identify it as sitting man. But not a single artist will draw it the same way. If you are trying to copy the way how somebody is making their gestures, you are doing it wrong. SCRIBBLE away if you must. Do it your way.

>>6275793
>We proved connectionism can get us to AGI more or less on its own
>we proved
SOURCE?

>>6271698
>>6271796
>>6271830
just draw lmao

>>6265716
>>6265658
>>6264971
>>6264965
>>6264935

>>6260838
/thread

>>6265429