/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6290784
>>"Just this post alone, which is objectively correct, might spark some effeminates to go out of their way to defend their ego--- not actually argue for the sake of getting to a higher truth and understanding-- but lying, manipulating and overall trying to discredit such an opinion to feel good about themselves."
Are you really surprised that a woman that probably directly profits off of simps would argue this way? There's a reason why there's this aggressive push to normalize this online social dynamic and whenever you criticize this kind of behavior, your met with overwhelming antagonism, because deep down they know it's wrong. They know they are only being valued for just being an above average women in a male dominated hobby and not praised for what they actually bring to the table. These girls all buy into feminism, all the "see me for more than my body" and "I don't need a man!" but their whole entire existence is predicated on being pretty while in a male dominated space. Women are incongruent at BEST, and the smarter ones have to have to do mental gymnastics to not have their brains explode from cognitive dissonance.
It's no use to even really argue about this shit. We're waist deep in the weird online social dynamic between men and women, there's no stopping this shit.