/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6402554
>illustrates for someone else's intellectual property
>said IP is arguably Epics biggest asset (fortnite)
>wants to keep commercial rights and special legal treatment

This woman is either insane or insanely dumb.
No company in their right mind would let you retain commercial rights on their own intellectual property. Not to mention the contractual exceptions the legal team would have to set up. I mean this is one of the highest-grossing gaming franchises of all time. Does she really think she could sell her contract work nilly-vanilly like that?

Epic would have to contain her exception into any follow-up contracts that deal with the full bundle of illustrations for the game. Like if they split the company up and sold off their assets, for whatever reason, they'd have to carry her ass contractually to that point. No company would do that. Hell, no sane person would do that...

How stupid is this woman? If you want more cash then negotiate that, but commercial rights?
Bitchnigger this is literally blue-collar contract work.

>asian American liberal arts student

Oh okay, that explains where that inflated ego is coming from...

>>1819463

>mfw this isn't a joke

>>1791556

>art