/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6922473
Why does everyone insist that fiction has to be perfectly coherent with and judged upon how it can be irl+morality ONLY when it's to make an argument against Straight Shota? But
>loli cannot be bad because fiction, its not real drawings stop saying bad things
>straight shota bad because... uhm real life and stuff and drawings are just like real people
On pure sexual gratification, leaving out any morality and social rules; loli is objectively bad, because you are "sexually attracted" to the little girl, which makes no natural or biological sense, no matter what kind of mental gymnastics anyone comes up with. And that is the critical issue.

Whereas the shota in ss is only tool to visually contrast the woman first and foremost. It is never about the shota himself.
You could have a midget or a small silhouette instead of a shota and it would change nothing.
Straight Shota is merely functional and a tag of which the genre can be recognized and classified with.

The only mind that is blown is your own.
What a god awful bait.