/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6835193
You need to practice more perspective, it's off in a lot of places
Secondly, there are parts that are hard to read/make out of what they are because of poor value control. Work on getting better at rendering.
Otherwise, good job. Keep at it

>>6797834

Beg:
>Nowhere near reproduction when using reference. >Struggles greatly with drawing from imagination.
>No ability to make money.
>Will often think: "This is going in my next progress post!"

Int:
>Somewhere near reproduction with reference, but errors often throw the composition off.
>Limited ability to draw from imagination. May vary depending on goals.
>Limited ability, if any, to make money.
>*Normie threshold* - parents will be proud to post work on refrigerator and randos will sometimes compliment work.

Pro:
>Faithful reproduction, minimal errors - if any.
>Can draw from imagination at a very high level. May vary depending on goals and training (See: Proko kangaroo).
>Could potentially make money from their work.
>Might have an insta/twitter following of adoring fans.

>>5236512
I think I used these pictures when I drew a bunch of nude figure studies.
I think it's nice. Dynamic pose and prominent muscles and all that shit

>>3897894
>cute
but they're all fat

>>3095764
Is a satyr

>>2695438
THIS THIS THIS
do they think we know how they look when they send blurred out of focus 3 pixel flat light photo

ugly photo - ugly fucking drawing