/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6627502
>"you wouldn't steal a jpg"
He says while he posts a "stolen" concept .

>>6513566
No one's touching your work. No AI has the capability to copy 1:1 work in a literal manner and if it did like some kinda image search, scrapw and photobash it wouldn't be AI then.

>>6511834
It's exactly like a human brain.

>>6506745
>>6506746

I don't hate artists and illustrators but you are full retard if you belive creative departments aren't going to downsize their staff when AI image generation tech matures. I know c level execs in advertising who already have proposals to do exactly this when it happens and belive me their boners are aching for the opportunity.
Also good luck on any lawsuit for copyright infringement. The very means which ML works absolves that accusation of any weight.
Inb4 pajeet, you artist have opened yourself to this ridicule and the gravey train of illustration, digital art commissions is now over.
If you have invested interest in a art career I would honestly consider a plan B unless you do it as a hobby/side hustle. Unless you are a fine Trad artist which in any case you shouldn't bitching or care in the slightest about AI art.

>>6463588

>>6448101
This describes it perfectly honestly

>>6437981
This thread.