[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Search:


View post   

>> No.6421763 [View]
File: 1.02 MB, 726x4846, 1667926714378472.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6421763

Humans can't physically learn on billions of images.

>> No.6379526 [View]
File: 1.02 MB, 726x4846, 1667926714378472.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6379526

>>6379506
>That is all its world is, relations between pixels. That does not at all equate to it using those exact same pixels, that is just false, because it doesn't have those pixels anywhere within its network. It's the same when you look at a picture and afterwards you don't literally have the picture stored in your mind, it instead becomes just a bunch of connections in your brain. You know as well as I do that the thing isn't literally copy pasting pixels.
See pic.

>Here's another angle: If you ask the AI for art made by X, then it will give you a bunch of stuff which is characteristic of X. I don't know how this is surprising or undesirable. If I asked YOU to draw me an anime picture, you will give me a bunch of stuff which is characteristic of anime, because you've looked at anime a lot and picked up on all those patterns, which you then put into paper, together with a bunch of other experiences and biases you have.
So you equate randomized machine noise to individual human biases and and experiences because you lack psychological knowledge. You replace that which you do not or cannot grasp with randomness like a good little cultist.

>> No.6369642 [View]
File: 1.02 MB, 726x4846, 1667413616596718.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6369642

>>6369639
Get better arguments.

>> No.6364744 [View]
File: 1.02 MB, 726x4846, artificial intelligence.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6364744

>>6364713
>No, you do not learn in a different way than AI at all, that's why AI is cranking out images comparable to humans work and why you are seething. if there was a difference, you would ignore ai as a joke novelty beneath your notice.

>> No.6356938 [View]
File: 1.02 MB, 726x4846, 1667413616596718.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6356938

>>6356825
Fucking die.

>> No.6355623 [View]
File: 1.02 MB, 726x4846, artificial intelligence.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6355623

We need more talk like this from people that matter instead of randos on comment sections.

Of course when all their cards are used up AI fags boil it down to "The technology exists, and it will be used. The bell can’t be unrung". But we still need to filter out the trivial talk clogging up discussion like the ethical and legal stance of AI tech or whether AI works the same as human artists. The cat is out of the bag so we ought to reorganize the way digital content is stored on the internet. Before this simple violation of human spaces turns into fullblown terrorism.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]