/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6467497
Art curation of the future,
>NDAs required to filled, signed and notarized before viewing.
>Phones camera and all electronic devices are prohibited. Phones and cameras locked will be inspected.
>Sketching or using anything to gain a reference is strictly prohibited.
>Artwork will be placed in a hermetically sealed room in vacuum that also acts as as Faraday cage. Viewing will be possible from windows that can be shuttered.
>Viewing times will be limited and recorded vai facial recognition and eye tracking to 2minutes. Attempting to view art after this time will result in the shutters closing before you can see the art.
>Speaking of the names of work or describing them will be prohibited.

>>6458178
[headcanon]

>>6445296
Look at the art this board produces, it's pedophile or animu shit that an AI can shit out in 3 seconds, all the "artists" on this board should kill themselves

>>6452164
>t.

>>6441552
I'm just using img2img and make memes real.

>>6438897
It depends on the training and models, I forsee a mix of high parameter models at the same time more efficient ML/AI training.
I think one thing that hasn't be consider is AI ability to determine what is aesthetic vs filling in latent space.
But I don't see that happening without major increases in hardware. Running high perameter models is super taxing.

>>6438906
It's not really the "amount or diversity" of images. Its also how much you train on them. A lot of it is open to subjective artistic thought.

>>6427017