/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3728191
lol no
https://youtu.be/o3G6L8doFcw

>>3709307
>Smaller businesses can decide when and on what platform to advertise too, ya dumb butt,
A: just because they can doesn't mean they do
B: when we're talking about market share and potential revenue and shit, bigger companies offer way more opportunities and stability than hoping that some mom and pop porn company is going to sponsor this shit.
and there's precious little stopping smaller websites (like J-List did at one time) from hawking their wares here if they're not butthurt about the content.
>if they're not butthurt about the content.
exactly. The nature of our media happens to function so that corporations with a lot of money control media content companies by not giving money to ones that host content that they don't like. That's the foundation of the whole propaganda model concept. What we are seeing is media platforms changing the content they allow to try and appeal more to more companies that will give them money.

>In either case it's certainly better than having the state make all of society's decisions based on some tenuous concept of what's best for "the people",
nigger nobody is talking about "the state." The propaganda model concept is inevitable in all for-profit media that where viewership determines value. These are private companies making their own decisions that they think will make them more valuable. This has literally nothing to do with your reactionary emotional politics.
> but I guess because you're a disaffected trust fund kid all of this is meaningless to you anyway.
So you refuse to acknowledge a basic phenomena in our economy, reflexively lash out into some needless defensive of hyper-capitalism with no argument, and then do an ad-hominem on top of it. Don't be goofy.

Like the concept of a "public option" internet that is funded publicly and allows for media aggregation and conversation without the need for ad revenue is interesting to think about maybe but it's not really what we're talking about.

REASON

>>3604064
tldr
>>3604073
>oh and actually he DID read it :3 cute
I mean I didn't. I looked to the second response and saw the first sentence. If I don't greentext response I literally did not read. Extreme ADHD be like that sometimes.
>you're drooling for attention, buddy.
Eh. I'm droolling for abuse. Makes me think of my childhood. Which then makes me want to do art.
>you read all of it.
I didn't though. But if it's any consolation it's the thought that counts. Just the fact that you're THIS upset is pretty fantastic.
>there's this girl i know
PROVE IT.
>>3604074
it is tho.
>>3604076
>i worked on two paintings today.
Pic related I'm sure.
> go suckle on your unwashed ballsack blanket, boi.
ITS ON MY BALLS RIGHT NOW ARE U PSYCHIC?!
>>3604078
>cause you trace em.
I did graphite transfer on those, yeah. Used to have 20 canvasses ready to go before I'd hop into painting. Most of those canvasses had been prepped 2 weeks earlier. It's not like you can't do that with canvasses that were prepped through any other means. It's just a matter of dividing up the labor and focusing on one aspect of production at a time.
>and then you post them in an unfinished state.
yep. None of them are finished until they all are. Why does this upset you?
>wwwoooowwww! so impressed right now.
idk about impressed but you're clearly very emotional lol.

>>3589389
plus that video was so goddamn cringey. I was playing with random people through the team finder discord. And I was talking to some Swedish dude with a perfect American accent and then he sent me a friend request on Steam that was a bunch of swedish gibberish, but I thought it was the guy that had just left, and I was like "holy shit what the fuck is up with those Swedes talking better American than Americans" or whatever, and he was like "oh that's me I'm in Malmo right now" or whatever it got SUPER awkward and I'm still bummed that I can never talk to that guy again. Was a fun time.