/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6483606
>>6483611
>state objective fact that a lot of art hides the hands because a lot of artists are hacks and also lazy, therefore the dataset includes a lot of poses where the hands are hidden
>massive butthurt copium for no percievable reason
Who knew crabs would treat a simple statement of objective fact as bait?

>>6483615
>>6483731
>>6483856
That type of image is specifically using img2img with a low denoising strength, which essentially makes it very similar to just running the picture through certain types of filters.
As a contra-example, I put one of my own drawings through it with a high denoising strength (0.69) + some tags and after some fiddling got this out of it. Very different from the art I actually put in. If I didn't use any tags it'd also be completely different.

>>6483860
Yep, 100% true. AI is useful as parts of an image or for people who enjoy the process enough to really dig deep into it. I really see it similar to fractal art in that regard.
Also Go Nagai is another (weeb) example for your list of "content over technical skill" here: >>6482111

>>6483942
AI can't be used for finished products where the content matters. It CAN be used for the supporting work - things like backgrounds, brainstorming, or a rapid basis for storyboarding. An example of the latter is this one here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QEfVtt8A2rg With some redlining that could be a decent storyboard (or at least set of thumbnails) for working on an animation or comic.

Professionals don't fly by the seat of their pants for productions that are important.