[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Search:


View post   

>> No.6962925 [View]
File: 511 KB, 1242x1908, 1598896790831.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6962925

>>6962923

>> No.6864696 [View]
File: 511 KB, 1242x1908, 1598896790831.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6864696

>>6864676
Well, it was rather obvious
>without even reading
Cool.
>why is that one more popular though?
I'll humor you.

Because while the woman easily baits with her charms, the man has the hook and is able to pull in and retain an audience with actual content, because he cannot rely on his looks/being a woman to get attention.

Women mostly create very shallow content, you can see it predominantly in the arts.
It is mostly pretty pictures that have basically no other value besides being pretty to look at.
Whereas men mostly focus on having other meanings to their art i.e. actual essence.

You can have a look at women pornographers and how they mostly garner big audiences because they post themselves with their nsfw work.
And have a look at male nsfw who have big audiences but never once showed their face.
>inb4 but this woman/this man dont do that generalization bad
Exceptions don't make the rule.

>> No.5111792 [View]
File: 511 KB, 1242x1908, 1598896790831.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5111792

>>5111717
>Do you have experience living with the population you are making objective statements about?
Nice non question. I wouldn't say things if i didn't know now, would i?
>related anecdote is argument and disproves your point
>my singular existence disproves all
not an argument and proves my point that you base fact on your own perceived reality.
Nice job disproving yourself.
>how is "women don't do any real work" not shifting blame as well?
I didn't use them as a scapegoat to make me stand out as better than them.
>just make female friends
You sure do like assuming a lot
>that you think their personalities are defined by it.
Again classic; "trying to invalidate anything you say because i believe you to be XYZ"
Why would i say what i say if it didn't see it for myself?
>I'm telling you that if you actually befriend women and talk to them regularly
So, why would i say something if i didn't know about it?
>women literally weren't allowed to work so it became part of our culture for them to do the homemaking/shopping as a result.
Doesn't change or disprove the statement i made.
>But you realize that men are also capable of this behavior right? That's not a female exclusive trait?
Why have i been saying effeminate?
Such behavior is feminine.
>I wonder who's ignoring reality. ME or YOU who i've been building up as the boogeyman i want to disagree with because bad word bad?
>real life experience?
Uh, you're not trying to shame me.
Why would you still try to put my social status and sexual activity in question?
>I had a feeling this would come up eventually.
And proving my point once again that women are not even real people.
Women would rather die than do something of their own volition that goes against the will of the masses.
If you want to become a plumber, you should become one, but you don't wanna.
>Women are criticized every single day, even celebrities.
Do their actions actually have tangible and lasting consequences?
>Inb4 strawman
No, they don't

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]