/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3732207
chyeah probably

>>3692753
>I commend you for being able to consider copying a picture work when you're achieving absolutely nothing.
you missed a word or whatever. I commend you for doing nothing and telling yourself that you're even with people that do something because you tell yourself the something they do doesn't count. That it's "absolutely nothing." That makes us even in your eyes! Classic.
>They probably didn't have god complexes about 'working hard'
How is it a god complex? Do you have a "god complex" about being lazy?
>as they constantly reminded the people they were arguing with that they copy photos everyday.
I mean what do we mean by "copy?" You only value art that is entirely unsourced from imagination with no references or what?
>They also probably had skills outside of 1:1 copying.
Eh Van Gogh was pretty autistic about using the big ol grid frame and looking actual images.

Plus I have a fair amount of "skills" related to artistic production.
>as they probably weren't proudly making fun of other anonymous users on 4chan
I'm not "proudly" doing anything. And I'm not "making fun" of you really. You're doing that on your own.
>when you're not really doing anything of note.
Your essay suggests otherwise. Lot of notes here.
>I've actually hit my goal of being able to draw people from imagination.
A: good for you I guess? Your pic related tells a different story.
B: I was drawing people from imagination when I was 13. I went to an art magnet school for most of muh grade school years.
>I've been animating for 7 or so years and hadn't really known how to draw them before.
dope.
>So yes I've improved and I am continuing to
show don't tell bozo.
>Good job drawing for a lot longer than me (I started last year)
Went without saying m8.
>and still not managing to draw a head properly
I can draw a head pretty well my guy. Sorry you're so upset but there's no need to be disingenuous.