/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4112749
NGMI

>>3985857
kys

>>3240894
>Adam Ruins Everything

>>2951266
terrible
polished turd.
not even memeing

look at those half assed feet.
the piece feels dry, the only substance is the saliva coming out of the toothless woman.
Their expression is so off is funny, the guy looks mildly annoyed and the girl doesn't look distressed or exited, I dont know what the fuck is that face trying to convey.also is hard to tell what age is she. thats the head of an adult in a child body.

>>2677573
>comparing two artists
>jpg

>>2568665
>fundies
fucking kill yourself

>>2250351
>asking for critique outside of beginners thread
>5312x2988 pixels
>picture is not even rotated correctly
As for your sketch: it's shit, read sticky.

>>2236760
>no plan/guide/schedule to make sure that you're making progress
>drawing for FUN
Filthy hobbyists.

As for your question OP: my challenge for October is to relearn color and design theory. After finishing videos with Nathan Fowkes, I'll move on to gnomon workshops.

>>2221905
>Kim Jung Gi Sketchbooks
>in a folder for music
You disgust me.

>>1792626
I think I'll pass actually.

>>1585505

does anyone else feel like being a human photocopier isn't all that amazing? I'm talking about those people who just re-draw something that already exists, like a photo, or doing a portrait or something.

I completely and utterly respect these people's devotion to learning and practicing, don't get me wrong. I understand they have technical skill and ability. They worked endless hours to be able to reconstruct something almost perfectly - but that's it - they just reconstruct. Any old schmuck can pick up drawing in a couple years and copy something from life. They aren't adding anything new to the world. Just copying.

Why don't these people do something amazing with all their talent? Instead of duplicating a portrait of some twat, why not use your imagination and create something beautiful? Why can't they draw with their mind's eye instead of their physical ones?