/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3024851
good for you, it's nice to see artists with some business sense. I'm just a hobbyist though so I don't make money off of it.

>>2157175

He's already said he appreciates the critique, so there's no actual point for you to be arguing this.

BBC-chan took the critique like a professional should. BBC-chan has my respect, and because I respect him I want to help him improve and reflect on my own personalized advice. That's all I can give him and if you cared about his improvement you would do more than arguing on his "behalf".

Any artist who refutes stylistic critique isn't an artist. An artist will listen to all opinions and reflect on them. You are not an artist, you are a white knight faggot. If you don't agree then do something else, it literally does not concern you.
Do you think coddling helps an artist to improve? I respect bbc-chan a hell of a lot more than most of these faggots on this thread. bbc-chan is a real ass artist that doesn't get complacent and haughty.

Have you ever thought that maybe one reason why he is so talented is because he studies others and takes advice from everyone? I study bbc-chan's art and admire a lot of his shit. Is he without fault? No. Am I without fault? hell no. Are the artists I reference without fault? NO.

Once you stop humbling yourself as an artist and say "it's good enough" then you stagnate, and literally become a deviantart child.

>triggered over facts
Just that you compare any statement about art is a "fact" means that you know nothing.