/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3656230.
>>3656233
This is not me, either you are samefagging or this is the most lame atempt at shitposting ever.

>>3656200
>Not my fault more than half this board has very low intelligence.
But you are giving them advice saying that this is the way to go. If your advice doesn't work with the people you are addressing, aka, most begginers, then it's retarded advice, just as I said in my first post. Are you braindead?

>Loomis dind't say his word is gospel
I never said he did. Can you go through a single post without strawmaning? Stop pretending I have a problem with Loomis, I love Loomis, I have a problem with the retarded shit YOU are saying. You are the retard, not Loomis or Robertson.

>I'm sorry, did the fundamentals change dramatically within the last 50 years
YES. Yes they did, you absolute brainlet. Look at pic related and try to tell me they are using the same principles and to the same extent.
>Inb4: hurr durr, color theory is the same, so it's composition
No, they are not.