/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3571811
I kinda want to do a strip club study. That'd be a fun goofy gag. You think I have to tip if I just sit in the back and draw their armpits?

>>3541754
>whats the point if the quality of your paintings is no where near Van Gogh's?
A: There is no point to anything
B: It's funny to me to focus on everything but the concept of "quality." The idea that self-destruction and total production and marketing being more important than actual technical skill is the bit.
>not even the medium is the same.
Well yeah it didn't exist yet. That uppity contrarian hipster dickhead would totally fuxed with acrylic.
>you can easily create one of your paintings per hour, 5 a day if you paint 5hours.
Do it then. Nobody cares about what you tell yourself you're capable of.
>how is that a challenge?
how is anything? And the painting aspect is like half of the project when you do time math for all the goddamn editing and eventual marketing and shit that'd need to get did for it to actually be a success probably.
>Oh I forgot, it probably is a challenge for someone who cant paint and relies on grids and tracing to draw and paint.
Yeah I know right. Like look at you. You're clearly really good at painting given your pic related and you can undoubtably hand-draw perfectly or whatever and yet you're just not?

It's the whole "my 6 year old could do that." And the response is "well they should have" or whatever. Gnome sang?

Like the President of the most powerful nation in history can barely read. Lost all of his dad's money on fucking casinos. Real stupid piece of shit. He just lied for attention and shamelessly self-promoted for 30 years and he got to be Der Kommissar. No reason I can't be the first official unofficial Van Gogh sequel.

But it's like an edgy rebootquel that only focuses on gettng the trashy parts right. Gonna cut a finger off 300 paintings from now. Is there a term for pre-phantom-limb pain?

>>3525546
>and if drawing is so boring and basic, why do you even use grids to draw someone?
I feel like you're trying really hard right now.
>to capture his likeness?
or her. and generally when you're doing an acrylic painting the "likeness" part doesn't come for many layers.
>why do you care about that? thats pretty boring
EXACTLY it is boring. It's like the scriptwriting process to me. There's plenty of different techniques by which a person can write a script, and they're all generally pretty goddamn boring.
>that's something a person that can draw would do, but without grids.
And my thing is that I like exact framing and proportions and junk. And I'm also producing paintings.
>I know you are probably in the same autism spectrum as Illastrat, but atleast he doesnt trace shit.
And he fucking should. His aesthetic suffers from his shitty cartoony drawing style. makes it look like some tryhard schizophrenic kid shit.

There is a fundamental desperate narcissism to kiddo cucks that are obsessed with trying to demonstrate how good they are eyeball drawing. Nobody cares! Being a "good artist" kind of stopped being about draftmanship with the invention of the fucking camera. If all you're bringing to the table is that you can draw good, you're one of tens of millions of people. Nobody cares about your doodles.

How many grid blow ups have you done? What is your experience with painting or printmaking or anything OTHER than basic bitch sketching? What value to create actual pieces that may be interesting to strangers do you bring to table? Most of the money launderers that actually buy art don't give a shit how it's made. It's like a magic trick or sausage or whatever.

>>3510439
working on a concept where it's mounted on a mirror thing or something so you can rotate it like a pinwheel or whatever