/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4144727
>And you have no argument to justify why you shill for these people, so you have to resort to whataboutism
you were trained by communists

>>3747061
Notice how when I talk about projection, I point out what (You) did that supports that idea. You're not really doing that. You just think you need to respond but you don't have an argument, so you just parrot things that I already said.
> Its really rather astounding really.
Not really. You essentially have to project when you're interacting with anonymous text generators. Difference is that literally no part of the post you're responding to is projection. It's talking about academic concepts and political messaging strategy.

I'm being serious: are you actually autistic?
>No more yous from me, this is your last
Yeah hopefully because you've killed yourself you niggardly cuck. You won't be missed.
>>3747120
Yep. The people you trust want you to kill yourself. Don't let them down.

>>3745262
>Long informative post, but needlessly complicated and probably faulty
I mean my second major was in psychology. Was raised by 2 diagnostic child psychologists. Spent a lot of time studying personality disorders and mental illness to better understand myself and my family and people in general and stuff. Plus when I've spent a good amount of time back when I had insurance talking to different types of therapists and stuff about all of these memes. I probably have a slightly better idea of my mental health profile than someone that's seen a few of muh posts.
>I don't need to know more about you than the fact that you post all the time and that you are extremely attentive to social interaction
Yeah but this isn't ONLY a borderline meme. Particularly not when histrionic PD is a thing. Like Borderline people will take too many pills and "attempt" suicide if they think their spouse is going to leave them. It's much less about basic interaction and attention with random people, and more about intense, intimate dependency on specific people. I just like having text-generators to give me things to think about. It's honestly more of a means to stay productive and focused on work by creating the perception that people are watching or rooting against me or something.
>which is why you write 12 paragraph posts to any anon that replies to you.
Seems like narcissism to me. I like to talk about myself. Don't really even care if anyone reads it normally.
>You talk about yourself all the time and you want listeners.
narcissism, histrionic.
>anyone that is all up in everyones face like that is bpd.
But I'm not in anyone's face. I'm sitting at muh workstation by myself looking at a computer.
> If you want to complicate things by dissecting your behavior and categorizing things into lots of categories with lots of names, go ahead.
That's literally what diagnostics is tho.

>>3725408
>that was my point...
no your point was to compare a standard phenomena in psychology with the belief in a toy-bearing demon that breaks into your house through the ventilation. Ideal self is a basic concept. Santa Clause is a pretty elaborate lie.
>no. I have dreams and ideas. habits to acquire or to lose, but it changes all the time.
Particularly when you find yourself acting like a faggot anonymously in the meme schlock thread amirite.
>There is no ideal self.
There generally is. In every single person. It being a fluid concept that changes over time doesn't negate this

The reason you probably struggle with this is you spend so much time being the opposite of your ideal self that your compass has stopped working. You're dying of cancer lol
>There are dreams and there is reality.
And there is you and your struggles with the mental illness that your retarded worldview is causing you
> you are such a pleb in this there is no use talking about it.
you literally are uneducated and emotional. It's a good thing you're a genetic dead-end.
>do you have brain damage?
I'm pretty sure you unironically do.
>now this is projection, see.
No you can pretty easily test this. Plenty of people already have. Essentially everyone has an "ideal self." You do. You're just a faggot fucking liar that spreads your mental illness cancer actively on anonymous imageboards.
>triggered again lol
no it's pretty standard messaging strategy I've been working on since all you literal gonna-die-a-virgins started embracing the meme label after it was boosted by Russian messaging strategy agencies for a month. If you're ever curious about what people are talking abut when they talk about "Russian active measures," your use of the label "NPC" is evidence. You're a puppet for people that want you to self-destruct and encourage it by pretending to be your friends. You're being exploited by a foreign government because you're lonely and pathetic and super easy to exploit.

>>3716252
>there will always be people better than you
>there will always be people that have more than you
>there will always be people that deserve less than you
>there will always be people that deserve more
>there will always be someone
>there will only be you
life is chaos and humanity is an accident. the only thing in existence during your awareness of it that you have control over is your self. When you let resentment and bitterness seep into your mind, you're ceding control to the subject at which you're externalizing your feelings.

Avoid those kid feelings by thinking rationally and approaching reality with a a less ego-egocentric feelsy worldview.

That is unless you think that you're motivated and driven to produce by those feelings. Then you want to be able to objectively harness those feelings while you're working but be willing to let them go and reflect on them at the same time. Things like "resentment" and "bitterness" are mental illness. If you can appreciate this and strive not to let malignancy rule your life you should be fine.

Also it helps if you're consuming a lot of political messaging, to stop doing that. So much of how people like (you) are being marketed to is about feeding and fueling feelings of resentment towards The Other to keep you acting and thinking against them out of spite. So much of the strawman, cherrypicking meme warfare stuff is fundamentally designed to trigger all these feelings constantly, and when you're uncritically being constantly exposed to it you don't even realize how these feeligns have been normalized and encouraged in your psychology. It's important to understand that a lot of people are spending a lot of money to make you bitter and resentful and agitated. Gotta be aware of malignant messaging strategy, and all other external influencers that feeds resentment, and not let that shit take control.

>>3717283
>I urge you to approach someone who you've NOT been bombarding with your wabi sabi rant basic shit and ask them what they see in your painting.
This is as much about bahavioral conditioning and motivation and stuff as everything else. Whether or not you think the concept of entropy is evident in paintings, the purpose of "how to paint entropy" is ultimately about being productive and constantly evolving styles and experiments and approaches to what you're doing over time and across memes. Telling a story over and through multiple paintings.
>Show me just one person that is going: "Oh, I get it! This is clearly the concept of wabi sabi and entropy, told in the media of painting!"
the paintings are props for the videos. It's literally going to be yelled at the audience.
>You are the loser
you're a winner!
>who tries to apply meaning to this a posteriori.
Yeah that's kind of how you learn and evolve and stuff. Entropy!
>uses black paint in skin tones
>looks interesting the first few times
>start leaning into it because it's so destructive and risky
>start ruining paintings
>keep grinding black paint in skin tones
>spend an entire year trying to successfully incorporate black paint in skin tones by overusing water to tear up the pigment
>evolves into an entire layering approach built around doing things wrong and covering them up
>evolves into multiple different styles and approaches that are built on the behaviors that developed around decisions made and reinforced over time.
>have a new approach and and appreciation for color mixing, values, as well as an individualized approach to the process that allows for a novel and recognizable aesthetic.

Not to mention that essentially all art applies meaning later and during production. Cry more /beg/ boye.

>>3707194
it's the same reason 4chan and 4channel had a break. It's a lot harder to get respectable advertisers when your site is full of lewds and nudes that make the advertisers uncomfortable. The idea is that by making 4channel cleaner than 4chan and purging tumblr of all the nudes, they'll get better advertisers and generate more revenue.

In our system we have what is called the propaganda model, where the consumers are the product and the advertisers are the clients. Corporations control media companies by determining what and when something gets money for people looking at it.

>>3676328
shheeeit now we cooking with grease.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pepper%27s_ghost

and I wonder if it could just be a lit black wall on the hidden side, and you could just put the waifu painting into the slot, and it'd look like she's sliding into place over fuckrobot portrait

>>3650766
>I can't make art cause I can only make utter shit
that doesn't make any scents. Utter shit can be art.
>hey, maybe that can be my style?
I bet you can't do it!
>The cancer of the art world.
I mean you just created a retarded strawman and acted like a disingenuous faggot at that instead of actually interacting honestly. That's cancer of all the worlds. That's mind cancer.
>What if the same happened in music?
It happens literally every day. Gotta start somewhere. There was a time when Jimi Hendrix couldn't play guitar. In fact a lot of his style and innovation came from him learning to play the guitar fucking "wrong." Read a book bozo.
>I can't play so I'll make that my music.
I mean there are a lot of producers that "can't play," and not to mention that shit like electronic music is literally
>I can't play so I'll make that my music.
It's just a nerd on a laptop!
>It just proves that you have no idea that art is an actual skill
Eh it isn't. Anything can be art tbphwyf. What are you 13?

Not to mention that I'm not necessarily "unskilled" at what I do. I'm probably better at acrylic portraiture than you are or will ever be.

Like this post is such a clusterfuck of meaningless hypocrisy. Like how do you get "an actual skill" without labor?

This post makes me think that you're lazy and you don't produce anything and you justify why you don't by telling yourself that it's an "actual skill" that some people just get to have.

And like the idea that you "can't make art" if it's "utter shit" seems like EXACTLY what I used to tell myself when I made nothing at all. Like the idea that "you either gotta make a masterpiece or not even try" is what I used to tell myself when I didn't try. It's easy to think that you PROBABLY have the "actual skill" of "art" to make a great painting when you've never made a painting. It's Schrödinger's "actual skill" and as long as you don't try you never open the box!

>>3604265
I actually thought you were Canadian or Vietnamese or something tbphwyf.
>spews a bunch of lame stereotypes
whatever you say Ratman.

>>3604269
appreciate this bud.

>>3599701
now we're talking

>>3593380
>Ok?
I'm implying that you're a do-nothing faggot and an impotent coward. They'll forget your name at your funeral.

>>3592225
>Yeah, about what I expected.
What would you expect? You didn't say anything.
>'ve seen guys like you a bunch of times, seen it before.
I haven't seen you and I never will. You're not making an argument. You're acting like a buttblasted asshole at me for some reason.
>You get a little success or attention, you think you're now a master of your domain, and know it all.
Not really. I even wrote a research paper in college about Rembrandt and how what he was doing with his paintings was kind of the foundation for what filmmaking ended up becoming. He was ABSOLUTELY making the type of stuff that became less important to people once the picture shows started happening. People weren't as focused on doing what he was doing with painting because they could do it with cameras, which were new and flashy and sciency.

>Or you're trolling.
How are you not trolling? What even are you trying to say? Other than that I must be wrong because I post my work?

>Either way, I don't really give a flying fuck,
Well thanks for the (you) telling me how much you don't care about intellectual honesty or art history. That was self-evident though. You didnt need to say anything.

>but I'll still call out your pompous nonsense for what it is.
I'm not wrong. This is basic history. impressionism was a reaction to industrialization. Rembrandt was not an impressionist AT ALL. What the fuck are you saying?

>Narcissism is a hell of a drug, you're a perfect poster child for it.
I'm more histrionic that narcissistic. I'm a child of a narcissist, which means I like being abused by malignant retards. That's where you come in.
>>3592230
>stop replying with so many greentexts you fucking sperg
No. Stop not having an argument you impotent doodoo mouth.

>>3572144
>implying I'm not being paid to post these using a predictive keyword response bot provided by the client