/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6216817
I dont really see difference between trad or digital for simple black/white pencil creations. You do exactly same stuff with just few minor differences like digital having easier time fixing errors and trad offering superior feedback. I was always computer "nerd" so digital painting allures me more than trad.

Sure there are digital traps like overusing undo, nonstop adjusting zoom/canvas angle or using fuzzy brushes to mask your shitty lines but trad has these as well: eraser, moving paper around and charcoal.

Now if you argued colors or texture now here the differences are massive and i am not sure which is better. But digital sure should be easier and cheaper in the long run i guess.

>>6216827
Why asking me? If its a jab at GIMP then its not really accurate, gimp has everything your fancy apps have as well, you can even load it up with brushes stolen from photoshop. Anyway pic related. It has fuzzy brushes and it even pick up pen pressure for few of them, but it doesnt really have opacity and "eraser" is just brush with background color so my answer is: NO it cant produce everything.

>>6216801
mine drawing tabled costed 40$, xp-pen 960 something. It just works despite what apple and wacom shills on /ic say.

>>6216844
Thats very innovative solution anon, i like it. My only question is from what material did you make the tip? It needs to be soft while providing small resistance to let current through