/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4776451
>>4776463
>>4776763
>>4777194
Holy shit this is embarrassing. I thought summerfags wouldn't exist this year but I guess all it takes is some weak bait to get the retards out of their holes

>>4289072
>the file name is kyle

nice try to stir up shit, not-kyle

its perfect and I want to suck on her big toes

>>3988447
You're kinda right, and this is definently bait. But let's break this down:

The image that OP posted took an estimated 100+ hours done in a very specific way, from an artist that has done, maybe, 20 other pieces adding up to around 2000+ hours doing this specific style. It's done by creating a large grid that segments the work into digestible chunks that can be placed in an order, like putting together a puzzle. Then, they layer colors down, over and over to get the specific color that the source material represents.

In all 2000 hours of drawing like this, the artist knows nothing more about: Anatomy, Compisiton, Value structure, Color, maybe a little more about lighting, but nothing about how the enviroment effects the lighting of the object. Given a refrece of a single vectored image, he would be able to re-create it, but take away the vector and have it in an enviroment, and he would surely fuck the values up. Furthermore, remove the grid, and the artwork itself would crumble since there has been no effort into learning anything

So I can't really draw like them. Nor would I want to. I don't want to be bound by his limmitations and have such limited knowedge, that feels like hell. I would sooner have my 2000+ hours of work in studying a variety of sources with a variety of media then be limited like that

>>3802908
I mean, at least make it less obvious so I can use an new image you fuck