/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Honestly, what's your endgame OP? Trying to make people stop drawing? Most people here are hobbyists that draw for fun. Sure, there are AIs capable of playing chess above human levels, but it doesn't stop chessfags. So why should art AI stop us?

Besides, do you genuinely not have anything better to do other than post the same threads over and over on this anus of a website? I mean, the world's your oyster. You have a pandora's box like art AI being served on a silver platter in front of you, capable of making anything you want, and yet you're here, complaining about artists. Why?

>>4395323
That's very easy to understand, but not to apply to abstract things like OP's picture.
ESPECIALLY cause it involves stuff like foreshortening, anatomy and all that.
It's very hard to think about rhythm and scale while at the same time planning where the spine or the calf is.

In these cases for me it's more of a case of imagining a cool pose and seeing if it works. All the compositional stuff I get right becomes a side-effect. I can only think about these shape and rhythm patterns when lining smaller stuff, like, say, a skirt or hair.

>>4181711
>>4181736
Super is a female adjective, which makes you wrong by default.

Also your tumblr-nosed woman looks mannish (more like wolfish) on both versions, you forgot about the very line economy you were supposed to demonstrate.

>make animation about a celebrity/trademark
>WAAHHHH I CAN'T USE IT COMMERCIALLY!
Nothing wrong here, aside from the fact anyone would even want to make an animation for this retarded uninteresting nigger.