/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

How about this. Name one man who is a famous model, for art or otherwise. Men have been given every opportunity to model for great artworks, but none have made a name for themselves.

Meanwhile the Mona Lisa was a housewife with five kids that transcended the painting she's in and became more important than the work itself.

You're comparing apples and oranges by saying "women aren't good artists", when they have always been, and will always make their mark in the art world by being models for artwork.

With that being said there are some famous men who have been in artwork, the same as there have been some famous women who made artwork, but asking for the roles to be reversed, or thinking one is superior to the other, is just being an incel weirdo that wants to think women are idiots.

Oh wait I forgot, you guys don't draw real women, you just draw your waifus.

>>3640481

>>3528858
ehhhh, he just never had the opportunity. Most of Post-Impressionism is incredibly sexually charged. If van Gogh, Lautrec, Gauguin (who kind of already did), and Cezanne had ready access to young attractive naked women to paint you better believe that's all they would've painted.


This Cezanne painting is of a fairly attractive young woman, I'm sure if he'd had the availability of models like this one he would've painted them more.


Unfortunately the artists who had tons of nude models were the ones who painted like prudes: Picasso, Renoir, Bougereau, Matisse...


Hey at least we got Modigliani