[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Search:


View post   

>> No.3728027 [View]
File: 1.49 MB, 2551x3237, 249. stone ugh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3728027

>>3728007
Except I wasn't really cut off from anything. That anon is full of shit. They've been making this threat for a year. I'd like to take a blast to the past to see all the homophobia and racism I've said though. I love the idea that someone spent days of their time going through the archives to make a collage of all the times I've said nigger and faggot and stuff. Like the Charlie Day conspiracy wall meme.
>shitpost on 4chan calling it a shithole
What I don't get is are you saying that 4chan isn't a shithole? Why would this be offensive to you? How much of a safespace cancerous nigger faggot snowflake are you? How young are you? Maybe you should go back to redddit kiddo.
>>3728013
If I was a robot would I say this: fart.
>>3728015
>t.desperate backpaddler
but that's what you're doing. (You) accused me of "virulent racism and homophobia." Do you actually believe that I am virulently racist and homophobic? Based on what, specifically?

And if I was virulently racist and homophobic, it seems like all the virgins that consume propaganda that makes them unironically say things like "NPC" wouldn't be so triggered by me.
>don't post screenshots, hejust wants to assess the damage
Well they don't have screenshots. And I could just go through the archives and probably find all le problematic comments myself. I've called anonymous shitposters meanie words. I've also talked about my view on linguistics and political messaging strategy constantly over the last decade. It's all pretty thoroughly established.
>>3728018
>I don’t even need to post the screenshots.
Yeah because you're lazy and you haven't done any of this shit. Like everything else in you're life you'll talk about it and feed on reinforcement for you having talked about it, jerk off, and continue doing nothing until you inevitably kill yourself.
>The best part? It’s all archived.
Yeah no shit. That's mostly why I do it. It's like Cortez burning his ships.

>> No.3683855 [View]
File: 1.49 MB, 2551x3237, 249. stone ugh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3683855

>>3683845
I DO need to focus more on glazing tbphwyf. The whole point of focus for second year was supposed to be about figuring out glazes and primers and all the other "white" additives and processes. And I keep NOT fucking with glazes or stopping before I get to the glazing step.

Have spearmented with mixing glaze into paint but that mostly just ended up looking retarded.

>jeff miracola has some painting videos u could learn from
I'll check it out.

>> No.3651102 [View]
File: 1.49 MB, 2551x3237, 249. stone ugh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3651102

>>3651085
I'm working on it. Really gooped it on on this one.

>> No.3646251 [View]
File: 1.49 MB, 2551x3237, 249. stone ugh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3646251

>>3646229
>all you have to do is use a glaze medium and it will look just like oils!
>all you have to do is use retardant and it’ll dry just like oils!
>all you have to do is spray the goddamn canvas every five fucking seconds with water and you can work it just like oils!
yeah exactly. Acrylics can emulate the advantages of oils. Oils cannot emulate the advantages of acrylics.
>They will never reflect on the fact that they are doing all this Mickey Mouse bullshit with acrylics in order for it to look somewhat like oils, when instead they can just work in oils.
I mean I do acrylic mainly just for the Mickey Mouse bullshit. It's the more "childish" medium and in many ways it involves more "skill" or whatever to make them work.
>ecause everyone knows acrylics are an objectively inferior medium.
eh potato tomato. Oils are "easier" in most applications, making acrylic kind of more impressive when it's well executed. Acrylic layering involves a lot more forethought and an entirely different order of operations that is to me closer to printmaking than oil painting.

idk I pretty much have to generally agree that acrylics are more shit than oils for portraiture, which is why I use them.

>> No.3575492 [View]
File: 1.49 MB, 2551x3237, 249. stone ugh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3575492

>>3574398
>then why are you posting them individually?
been working all cropping and organizing and numbering the first 296 and try and turn it into a gif
>there's no reason to infer growth because there's no chronology to these.
yeah they're all getting numbered up. The numbering is generally indicative of when the paintings where started. Some have gotten redid on, some can only get did on on the same day in subsequent years, idk rules are rules.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]