/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6531106
>See, I tried that and reactions were still majority negative. Even with the lineart refined, it's still just as cluttered but somehow ended up looking even worse.
if your art feels cluttered then you should start simplifying your details so it's not overloaded. Like your focal point should be the most detailed thing in your piece, no need to draw every lock of hair or turf of fur to make it look good, we already know you can draw countless little details. That is also where the lines should be the heaviest not in the sparks around the character. think about your focal point.

>And then the fact that anons pointed out my anatomy, proportions, and character design were just as shitty so I guess everything about this pic is just bad.
this pic is far from irredeemable imo and even if it was bad you finish it, read the crits, separate the useable feedback from shit posting, go practice, and use refs while daying your next picture. the biggest issue with the anatomy that I see is how squished the head of the tiger looks here. You should practice drawing animals' head more going forward.

>It looks good. Was those two pic you mentioned also yours?
I'm not that guy, i just lurk from time to time. I just thought his work was a good example of the point I was trying to make about line weight.

random sketches from the other day.

>>6531210
thanks but i have no blog