/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6636825
>I mean people were roasting Ren & Stimpy creator the other day
Too bad, his is an example of a style that AI would struggle with. It's too bad much of /ic/ is stuck in this animu/conceptshit hugbox.

>>6629368
He can draw great stuff, but some of his stuff can be astoundingly shit as well (what the fuck is nose-hat in picrel?). He's one of those guys who draw "gross out" or "ugly" characters, not realising that those can have appealing designs as well, or maybe he does realise that, and is just too up his own ass to realise his design is shit.

>>6533891
Only blacklisted peeps I can think of is; that creator of Clarence who had a mental break down and acted creepy towards a woman, which is rather sad as he essentially had achieved his dreams only to lose it all because of his mind bugs; and John.k, which is probably fairly deserved, but also let's be honest, his days of doing an decent work were very far behind.

>>6536016
>I started working as a freelancer for Japanese studios last year
Out of curiosity, do you think you got hired more because Japan is currently desperate for animators (because of their short turnover), or because you know Japanese or whatever else. Was it easy to get hired for Japanese work? Is it remote or on site?

>>6266364
I like the Spumco style, but I'm not the biggest fan of "gross out art" (pictured here). Also art where the artist seems to be trying really hard to be "wacky!" - and it just looks awful (also pictured here).

>>1846180