/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4072304
>>4072717
What you have to consider about positions like these is that they are proxy positions. Their real position is:
>I don't like black people. I don't want black people to appear in any media.
So they pick up these retarded positions and are forced to defend them, and it just evolves and is met with obvious answers. Examples.

Someone with left or neutral views decides to add a black person to their cast:
>Whoa, if race doesn't matter then why make the character black?
Well, because it gets a little closer to the demographics of the area they want to explore and it provided black actors with work. Also, whites aren't the default race.

>Why is it the responsibility of the other races to represent blacks? Why can't they just make their own things?
It's not, and there are black creators. This ultimately stems from a weird position, you don't have to be black to write a black character just like you don't have to be white to write a white character.

>But black people are ugly!
>Not every one is? Also characters and art in general don't have to be physically attractive. Art doesn't have to bow down to the lowest common denominator, even if it is a commercial product.

>Why do black people have to put black people into their art? I'm a little tired of all this F O R C E D D I V E R S I T Y !
You wouldn't ask any other group this question. Why do Japanese anime shows star primarily Japanese people? Why do European and American shows star primarily whites? Why don't the Japanese create work primarily about Europeans? It's because people do things to service their groups and to represent them on the world stage. Everyone is a little biased, and in the case of African Americans they feel they have a lot of work to do catching up (and they probably do).

>Isn't all of this a little Anti-white?
No.