/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6828681
It's got kind of a stilted look to its animation - it's also a weird in-between of 3D and 2D, it's not hideous, but I'd need to see a longer animation to know I feel about it.

>>6828686
>Animators never traced video footage
Rotoscoping. Ralph Bakshi did it often.

>>6828827
>B-b-but AI doesn't copy, a-a-and it's got near infinite ways to generate original images!
lol. I don't even hate AI, or am I particularly worried about it, but I get annoyed with how dishonest some of the peddlers of it are.

>>6819555
It's at least less derivative than anything AI 'Artists" will ever make.

>>6411586
>How can you know artists are not just drawing a person they have seen?
No artist can copy perfectly, even if they tried. Takes years of training to be an art forger, and even then forgery can be detected.

AI, on the other hand, copies extremely easily. You could say that's all it does...

>wideacale international theft of all artists around the world
>doesn’t get why we’re mad
Confirms my assumption that IT incels are the stupidest of them all

>>6283786
>>6283834
No. It recreates sections of images and blends them together essentially, thus the photobashing insult. AI cultists are so desperate for AI to be accepted they'll just outright lie.
Where as if a human draws from an image reference, they're likely to do something completely different than the reference. Fuck Off.

>>6278462
Machines just cut and paste images together. This fact is only obscured because of the large data sets. It does not think and understand like a human. A computer might as well be gears and levers

>>6274370
I love it how the supposed /g/ tech kikes feint ignorance and retardedness when asked this. Let's have a look at the <1% sample library of scrapped pictures LAION database has to give the AI the Artists parameters and names...
https://rom1504.github.io/clip-retrieval/?back=https%3A%2F%2Fknn5.laion.ai&index=laion5B&useMclip=false&query=simon+stalenhag
Uh oh why is Simon Stalenhag there? Surely the AI must not be reusing parts of his art like it does to picrel... This AI draws and understand Loomis by itself? Right?????

>>6252382
>>6252569
Uhhh why is bloodborne cover man appearing here surely it didnt just photobash him from a google pic right AIbros?

>>6259388
People always bought cheaply made shit for too much, so what's the difference between this and someone buying a print of some stock photography?

>>6262073
And if the guy painted it, as anon claims, this is the most limp-wristed anger possible.

>>6261715
>>6262253
Quit living in sci-fi fantasies you dolts. It's "AI" in name only. Look at this image - does that look "inspired" to you?

The future is interactive photobashers with booru filetags.

Stable Diffusion ripping off bloodborn art