[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Search:


View post   

>> No.4086058 [View]
File: 64 KB, 500x454, ADA598BA-1AD5-46C7-A8A0-53C8DA95CCF2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4086058

>> No.4037331 [View]
File: 64 KB, 500x454, tomie.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4037331

>>4037232
>>4037329
>Is it not hypocritical to refuse allowances for...
You're using bigger words and redundant language here because you think it more clearly illustrates your point but it does exactly the opposite. You're saying that it is hypocritical to not like stylized art but praise art that fits all "criteria" but doesnt fit the "criteria" that makes it less beautiful. What is this criteria? The fundamentals? The elements of the drawing? What is "a less beautiful interpretation of existance"? There is good art that is ugly that I would wager a lot of anons would praise for being good, like the designs of Giger or the manga of Junji Ito. The entire premise in which you're arguing is vague and false. Try to be less pretentious next time.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]