/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3289713
Alright, if we're referring to that post, I don't see how this is considered a valid critique. I mentioned how I didn't understand how the perspective could be off (outside the head) because I didn't betray much from the ref in that aspect. No, I'm not rejecting the idea that the overall perspective was flawed, but that anon honestly did not point me in any direction. I also don't understand why people don't think I take critique. I actually started saving the critiques I get starting last week since I greatly value them. Why else would I post on this god forsaken site?

Also see here >>3276275

>inb4 lmao sperg much?