/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6871513
>>6871516
I was just about to point something out, this is what happens when you poke the queen bee and a legion of fanboys crawl out of the woodwork in an attempt to rebuttal your critique with baseless arguments such as it is his style and you can't critique his unique style etc. Do yourself a favor and filter these threads, let the broken toys be confined to their echo chamber of circle jerk. I'm observing the same hugbox mentality from the newly created cute girl study generals, they'll suffer from the same ilk that spirals the general thread into stagnation.

>>6855740
The idea behind a nuclear family has been ostracized so much so that a globohomo corp like McDonalds promoting family values is sending shockwaves. Due to Japan's infertility rate and possessing a demographic with the most childless middle aged Women there is no need to subvert the idea of a traditional loving mother and father with a child that used to be principles behind western values, moreover the advert itself demonstrates to viewers the contrast between the subliminal messages between the west that goes from consume and sodomize to marry and reproduce.

>>6617209
I-Ill show myself out. You won

>>6109045
g-good job

>>5222371
I'll give you one week. Download all the Loomis books in the Loomis.rar file from here:

>http://www.alexhays.com/loomis/

Start with Successful Drawing by Andrew Loomis and knuckle down the importance of perspective. Do no skip a single page, read through everything and buy the tools the book tells you to use. If it is too much information, look for Fun with a Pencil by Loomis and introduce yourself to the basic forms and his blooks. Do not skip a single blook or you are the big gay and a faggot. I'll keep this thread alive for you so we can point and laugh at you in the end.

>>4945640
Draw me 10 different Loomis plates demonstrating the use of correct perspective on the floating heads. You may use the blook heads found from fun with a pencil.

>>4881380
The pelvis is the pelvis, it proportionally remains the same but if you want a disgusting piggish cotton cheese ass like these retards want it depends on how the body stores its fat on top of muscle mass but there are two types of fat:

The "healthy" fat where the figure power lifts weights and has increased muscle mass.

Your typical lardasses ITT that shitposts on a Nepali Tuk Tuk Benchracing image board which sags and is not at all pleasant to look at.

That's where references play a big role to understand the subtle differences between what type of fat you want to work with in refining form.

>>4851230
>a-aha! He's just admitted to hating W*men therefore he must be an incel! - that'll show him! Heh...
Not an argument. Look at what happened to brett kavanaugh as a prime example and the #metoo movement. You have no basis or support for any argument here other than your feelings.

/ic/ has always put emphasis on anatomy and has always been anal about perfecting the figure by refining its forms proportional to an idealized olympian greek god. To say that Porn and the Porn threads have decreased the quality of posts on the board is false because Porn compliments these ideals that /ic/ is so bent on muh anatomy and loomis thumping.

If anything, Porn should encourage you to compliment anatomy and learn more about the fundamentals behind figure drawing. If you're looking for a reason as to why /ic/ has been more shittier than ever feel free to blame all the tumblerttas, the plebbitors, the special snowflakes, the queefing Roasties, their beta orbiters and the influx of normies coming here trying to make this their own safespace and bringing about a mass hysteria over the pedo boogieman where everything they do not like is pedoshit.