/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

6919923
>explaining things as unbiased as possible and based on nature
>"ur doing fallacies. ME like little girls, what now? no argument? lmao checkmate. morals bad. emotional attraction = physical attraction. double checkmate bigot. Liking sexual mature women is a social structure! triple checkmate!"
Told you, no point in arguing with these irrational porn addicts, they just want to validate their fetish and go as far as questioning nature.

>>6445175
Yes, how dare someone actually argue about something and not just spam snarky tranny buzzwords as arguments so they showed dominance over an anonymous forum and don't have to cry themselves to sleep for not having farmed enough followers and likes for the day?

You dont even know what shitposting is. Shut the fuck up.
>>6445177
>i love baiken
Already biased.
>nitpicking
Wrong again. In this context, anatomical perfection or minor mistakes don't matter to a viewer/consumer, all it matters is appeal aka the end result.
>right has issues but its ok because it looks like made by human
Again, bias.
How are flaws ok when made by humans, but not ok when made by ai?
That's a double think/standard.
It's either not ok for both, or ok for both.
Who made it or how it was made is irrelevant.
>>6445200
Can you actually prove your accusations as so as to actually make a legal case and legally prosecute the tool or the creators of it?
>guns don't kill people, people do
Yes.
Now, how does AI kill artist by itself?
You keep contradicting yourself.
>>6445203
>incoherent illiterate retard is unable to comprehend contextual information
No wonder you fear your updated version, you fucking bot.
>>6445205
You actually make a good point.
>the left is just a collage of thousands of images mashed together to get the end result.
If it's a collage that doesn't resemble or replicate the original, it is protected and counts as original artwork.
Read the laws.
>>6445192
How am i wrong?
Holding a moral highground based on the fact that somehow human made art is automatically regarded as "more valuable" (by artists themselves) than any other type of art, isn't the deus-ex-machina of argumentation.
This shit ain't black and white, Anon.