/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>Are you one of those losers who draw for fun or something?
Yeah pretty much. I'm not interested in trying to make money off my art anyway unless I own the IP, and I'm not willing to give up the control I have drawing to an AI. AI is definitely capable of making stuff that's "good enough" but not what I actually have in my head. The only thing that concerns me about AI is new generations years from now won't understand what the point is in drawing something yourself, which is depressing to see but ultimately won't affect me

>>6248443
>>6248445
>>6248447
Again, people don't give a fuck. People want the result. Listen, I'm not saying it's a good thing. But it is how it works.
The fact no one even asked how he made these or asked him to show his portfolio is a dead giveaway on how much people care about the process. THIS is the truth. It's not about AI. It's not about AI at all. It's about people, about the current generation that doesn't give a fuck how anything is made. Take green energy fags for example. They don't give a fuck about their "green" car porducing even more devastating damage to the enviroment once disposed, because it will damage someone elses country in like 10 years.
We live in a world where the content is disposable, and your drawings are not art. They're content. People give it one look and move on. Content is disposable, and that means there need to be a steady and fast supply. You're delusional if you don't think this shit won't inflate the market.
Again, this is not about AI at all. It's not even about what people think. It's about how people actually act and operate.