/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3650788
>If this art "project" is about 4chan and requires you to annoy people and fill every thread with your art, honestly, I think you should be banned.
I just respond to antagonistic (you)s and use my reaction image art on the art board. It seems weird to me how /ic/ probably has less average images posted in threads than fucking /lit/ or whatever. Just a fucking wall of text replies and everyone rees at anyone that posts their work. Why should I be banned for posting art in the art board?
>This is a place for teaching/learning.
And this is a project built around exactly that. I'm still planning on making this into an "instructional" video series and stuff.
>Other people aren't here for your amusement.
I didn't necessarily imply that they were.
>That's actually a horrible way to think about other people anyway.
I dont really think that way though. You asked me why I'm asking /ic/ for feedback. It's a dumb question so I responded with a meme.
>Everything. Parts of the face that should be aligning aren't. Different parts of the face are painted from different angles.
I mean almost all of these are exact proportional "copies" of the original image. examples?
>You're not the worst at this stuff though so don't feel too bad.
I don't.
>Dude. I'm sorry but that's not a "proper drawing".
Yes huh.
> The proportions are all fucked up
I mean they aren't though. It's a grid reproduction of the original image
>and it's a bunch of scribble.
yeah it was a goof related to a conversation I was having in one of Illustrats threads where anons were talking shit about gridding. The scribbles and shitposts written on the canvas were to cover the grid lines sarcastically.
>he pic attached to this post is an okay underdrawing.
yeah basically all of my shit looks like that before I paint on it. I don't bother with diagonal lines though. Like I'm used to people talking shit about how I'm a "copy machine" so this is kinda confusing2me