/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>7059977
by shitposting on 4chin some stupid meme and getting yous. pathetic right?

>>7049530
better name than X (lol). have to make an account just to look at it though? I will wait a while and see what happens.

>>6697112
I dont know if rendering is a meme. But the majority of AI shit has that awful plasticky heavily rendered look to it.

a general rule of thumb is to avoid blackpills.

What makes this book so hard for begs? Because everyday someone badmouth this book here. Just dont take the cartoon heads seriously, focus in the late part of the book about construction of the body and thats it

Should an /int/ buy this book?

82 years, and still the best. How did he do it, bros?

I'm not even at page 20 and I already want to kill myself. Fuck you /ic/, I'd rather draw background than these ugly ass faces. This artstyle is outdated and not fun at all.

>>5047230
Fun with a pencil

am i wasting my time with this book? i was having fun until i read posts about loomis being bad :(

I've been told by numerous people that this book in particular is all you need to become a pretty decent artist. Not even his other ones. Is this true? Is this a pretty good overview of everything you need? If not, what book is?

>>4485639
Read this book. It will help you on your journey.

>Low beg - Loomis is great
>Mid beg - Loomis is good, but skip fun with a pencil
>High beg - Loomis sucks and is a meme

>big gap

>Master - Loomis is great and fun with a pencil is the most important book