[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Search:


View post   

>> No.6934580 [View]
File: 123 KB, 470x657, 1679646894443625.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6934580

>>6934569
ah yes, the soul stealing device.
the thing that simply learns through generalization, not of single images, but large amounts of images in tandem.
that doesn't use your data for anything except that generalization (i.e. learning).
that doesn't use anything other than its own generalized representation for things to generate its images.

it's a mystical "soul stealing device"
mind explaining how it steals your/my soul?
look at pic related. how do you think this soul stealing works?

or an interesting question: what parts of this image do you think belong to other artists?

>> No.6930178 [View]
File: 123 KB, 470x657, 1681846435045388.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6930178

>>6929742
>>6929729
the reason is because it has abilities that only people used to have. that's why i'm drawing parallels to people, that is just the best way to explain it. it's really that simple. i'm not saying it is a person though.

>If a machine that doesn't actually think or feel or get tired or whatever does it, why should we automatically be okay with it and allow it to do its thing and ruin the market it exists in?
because it is a incredibly useful tool? because it can automate art?
the real question is why we SHOULDN'T allow it. why WOULD you suddenly change your opinion on learning when it comes to AI? don't you see how hypocritical that is? how self serving your entire argument is?
>"AI is too much so that's why we can't allow it to learn from our art."

>Its literally a plagiarism device
>It's a plagiarists dream
ah, i asked you this before (>>6929667), thanks for clearing up which flavor of retard you are.
imagine seeing shit like OP or pic related and still deluding yourself into thinking that AI steals or plagiarizes from images.

i doubt your intelligence and your skill as an artist if you think what AI is doing can be explained by collaging or stealing of images.
i'm won't even bother explaining anymore. but look at this shit. have you ever wondered how this shit actually works? how it can possibly do this?

>>6930006
>think of it like this
>*incoherent mentally ill polshittery*
thanks

>>6929708
i don't do commissions in general. even before AI. that has never been my goal as an artist.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]