/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6878351

>>6858647
>"you must be a schizo because i don't get it so lol i just disregard it"
ad hominem
>"its irrelevant because i say so"
>"a human needs other data to create data because i can't conceive otherwise and it aids my point"
Argument from ignorance.
>unable or unwilling to contextualize information because it would work against his points
>further ignoring other anons explanations and objective reality
peak bad faith
It has everything to do with this argument, because you're objectively wrong with the intent of only validating your own arguments.
>do you follow
i do
you are incapable or unwilling to apparently

Point is; a human can take the unknown and build on it without needing further data i.e. the human learns.
History of the human race is proof of this argument.
An image generator cannot do that because it lacks simply the awareness of itself and the awareness of what itself is doing.
This is really just basic reasoning.
And i said, the more you keep going like this you either out yourself as actually mentally ill or chris-chan tier autistic or simply arguing in bad faith.

You might fool your average flags and pronouns in bio twitter artist with this shit, but we're used to arguing here and we lurked more than enough.
I see this little shitshow you've been doing non-stop as nothing more than honing my rhetoric and mental practice.
I mean, i get playing devil's advocate but goddamn you've been btfo by every anon on this board and you still keep going.

Are you even a real person? You really don't seem to be.
I don't fear AI, but if autistic chatbots that can't even be coherent and only parrot words and sentences, it would really be a good thing to unplug the internet or ban porn.

>ITT
>High IQ AI prompter gets BTFO into infinity by low high beg

>>6632113

>>6576791
>"he did something different!"
>"it's good because it's novel!"
>"y-y-y-you're just mad and asshurt stop posting laughing reaction images im not going to reply to you anymore"
The absolute state

Holy shit
The everlasting muse, is a macabre take on the picture and it's theme, if anything.
And it's not like a variation of this has never been done before.
It's shallow and a low hanging fruit; an easy braindead take and twist on the image and its context.
The execution is also not really impressive, but rather a gimmick, as stated here >>6576744
>framing it as somehow being bad
Did the voices in your head tell you this? Learn to read, faggot.

>>6512661
You're missing the point, faggot.
Why the fuck would you waste time and resources drawing fotm trash just to impress normies, zoomers and weebtrannies for meaningless numbers?
For fucking what, the CHANCE of getting discovered by some company magic fairy and becoming rich and famous without having to draw anymore?
What are you producing besides fucking visual dopamine you have to keep churning out or stop existing if you don't?
>being a pornfag is great
I lol
i lmao
i zozzle even

Pornfags are the most miserable low iq fucking trannies in existence. All their lives are porn and "networking" on discord 24/7 and most of them are on some actual sex offender list or actual groomed underage unironical homotransexuals.
Just go through the profiles of people liking porn shit like that and you'll see it's irl bald coomers, trannies and underage kids.
That's what you want to do with your life, be king of a pile of literal cum cumming on the pile so you can get likes from pedophiles and kids?

If you do fucking fanart and aren't getting paid the big bucks by the piece for it, you're fucking retarded and deserve everything that goes wrong with your life.

>>6429460
>if 70 people spend money i'm gonna be rich
Is this really the peak of your intelligence?
>>6429462
>the exception makes the rule
I don't give a shit about e-celebrities.
Exceptions don't make the rule.
Stop using them as standards.