/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>for free

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWXYoD7wfOs

[ - ]

>for free

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3YWMlbMvXk

[ - ]

>>2330535
>I guarantee you they think that shits gross.

Yeah, just like how girls always say they don't care about the size of a man's penis, or the amount of money they make.

>>1809454
This, and I've been down this sad road before.

I worked with a family member and a couple of his friends on a game as an animator. I made a substantial amount of unfinished but earnest content while these guys used our weekly "meeting time" more often than not to make small talk about what television shows they were watching and whether or not they were going to go to lunch together the following day, while very seldom producing anything tangible themselves that I was aware of besides wholly superfluous news updates to their website that were viewed almost exclusively by us.

Despite the fact I felt dubious about the whole thing from the first month, for an entire year or so this went on until we just all gave up with the game's "creator" owning the distinction of having expended less effort in realizing his project's completion than anybody else in our 5 man staff, including another (better) artist that had come aboard the free-work express a couple months before we all fucked off.

To be sure, I was not the most prolific I could have been either, but working entirely for free and being oblivious to what if anything those other guys were doing was super demoralizing. Of course, having done all that I did for naught was perhaps moreso.

This is what it's like to be somebody's tool

>>1794913
You're over-thinking it you obstinate fuck. Period.

FWAP is a fun little mostly informal book that happens to extrapolate into more depth including your fucking precious 2point perspective and cubes later on. For fuck's sake, man.

>>1794919
>Loomis is shit

Whatever you say, anonymous internet contrarian fag. Your dismissive comments don't overrule the endorsement of someone like Alex Ross and neither does your Tehmeh jock-sniffing.

>Tehmeh
>believes himself to be intimately familiar with the process and workflow used in each individual piece by an artist that died 20 years or more before he was born

I don't even.

>>1795042
>What do? I can't improve like this ;_;

Apparently you can, because "Tehmeh"® said you can! Just keep drawing shitty forever and as long as you know it's shit and are "critical of it" you'll get just as good as he did when he was grinding studies for 12 hours a day. LOL