/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>7176534
>So it's better for the porn artist to move to a separate platform. There are still adults only websites, very niche, but still somewhat active. Again, it's unfair for the porn artist if what they want is fame or a following, but it has to be done.
But you don't get it, Anon; they want to peddle porn to kids, hence why they are so adamant about everyone else letting them jerk off in public or else they're transpornohomophobic.
That solution is reasonable, but their response will always be the usual deflection and mental gymnastics
>muh parents
>kids should not be allowed
It's useless to reason with these subhumans
>>7176536
>literally crying for the jannies to remove anyone that criticizes them
Goddamn, how unironically mad are you faggots?

>ITT
>retarded lolishitters giving normies a lot of reasons to introduce internet ID verification and the banning of porn
>they do the slippery slope but god forbid anyone would do the slippery slope on them
>Today they try to normalize loli
you are here
>tomorrow they're going to demand parents let them fuck their kids or they're bigots who hate freedom of expressions or whatever shitty excuse they need.
if you were actually honest about loli and not with the end goal of wanting cp to be normalized, you'd go protest this shit

>>6643082
>>6643036
>>6643024
>>6643013
>"A tranny and a furry post their works and all they do is trying to see who has the bigger dick while making passive aggressive passes that would make the most hysterical 15 year old girl who hates her parents, rethink her whole life and start treating her parents with the love and respect they deserve for keeping up with her shitty attitude without beating the shit out her every time she opened her retarded mouth to speak"
Ah well, it is rather obvious that you both planned this shit.

>>6219330
>can't read
>"NO UR SPERGING OUT BECAUSE CAPS"
All you're showing is that you're unable to process abstract information.

Maybe post something worth taking seriously then you'd get a non-standard response, you low iq monkey.

>>6137870
Only if you share yours.
>>6137873
>"OH WOW CONSUMER MEDIA REFERENCE GOOOOOOTTEEEEEEMM!! HAHA MANCHILDREN ANIME DEODARANT DOUBLE GOTCHA!!! GOOOO READ NOVELS TRIPLE GOTCHA!!!! WOOOOOW!"
Going out of your way to post the most braindead normie shit imaginable is the epitome of effeminated faggotry.