/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6939002
Imagine if some rich guy told you to stop yearning for financial success because money doesn't make happy.
Imagine if some serial killer tried preaching to you that violence is never an answer.
Imagine if a normie tried to convince you to stop trying to act and put on a mask in social situations, but instead "be yourself".

Sure, they might be right, but they're still faggots who just want to virtue signal and get approval. That's their intent.
Their words are hollow platitudes of which they use to boost their social image.
>Some literally who that it's not even known in their own home has to say it in order for you guys to learn the message?
Yes, because the literal who has nothing to gain from it, whereas the social media faggot with big followings are just pandering to an audience for clout.

In the end, the message itself is relatively valuable, but coming from such individuals, it cheapens the message as feelingjerking/pandering/patronizing. It's almost like an insult as if some millionaire was crying about having so much money and virtue signaling about how being a billionaire isn't worth it.
They're fags that only say
>"pls don't forget about me"
plain and simple.

>>6791405
>I do anon my started two years ago my legs are like fucking mahogany pillars now.
nice
>Consumiod mentality has been a disaster for the human race by god just reading the responses from the promptertrannies you get the impression they just want to have a spike hammered in there skulls that pumps in dopamine like lab rats or something how the fuck could you live a life that shallow?
That is most probably their ultimate fantasy. These creatures are a detriment to society and a danger to intelligent life.
Imagine going through your live seeking to just lay down like cattle and getting milked out of cum and blood, fed through tubes and kept alive only to chase dragons.
Absolutely revolting.
I have an issue with that because they want to force it on everyone else as well.
I mean, you want to live in the pod, eat the bugs, and live in virtual reality while having a onahole attached to your dick? Go do that but miss me with that gay shit
But nooo, we have to validate them, too, because miserable niggers can't go die alone.

>>6725881
I like how the animosity towards social media is steadily increasing even among normies.
Once they reach critical butthurt, there is guaranteed change because they're the main consumer demographic and if they go, the site will be dead.

And when twitter's reputation and activity is completely down the drain, you won't have retards here making 100 threads a day on how to get twitter followers and using their inflated or botted follower counts as authority since twitter numbers will finally be regarded as meaningless as they actually were all along.
And the schizos who managed to farm high numbers will finally shut the fuck up.

>>6580151
>But why would you do it?
Why not?
>What there is to gain to do the same cheap shit to AI artists that they do to real artists?
What do AI artists gain by passing AI generated pictures as works of their own sweat and effort?
>AI art is like feeding off the wastes of other people, all the value a picture could have had dies at the moment you discover that shit is AI generated.
What is the problem if one would be feeding on AI art?

I'm just wondering, hypothetically.
If AI artists pass AI generated pictures as their own work, they really should have no problem when others take what AI artists claim as theirs, as their own work.
Am i wrong? Why should different rules apply only to me?