/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6139353
>And any client that is ok with something more generic won't, artists will lose that marketplace
You can't lose what you don't have. Clients that want something more generic can already get it as cheaply as running a high-end AI (or cheaper, ie free).
>>6139346
Actually I change my mind, AI is already smarter than some humans. Damn.

>>6139653
>monolids
Doesn't mean what you think it means. Asian eyes are marked by having the epicanthal fold but most also have the "double lid" crease above the eye. The actual "double lid" is the small section in the corner of the eye under the fold of the eyelid, which asians and most anime characters lack.

>>6139665
Picrel for us crackers, >>6139678 for n*groids (not saying that woman is black either, but blacks also prefer pale-skinned girls in general; tan was popular in the 80s and 90s but is back out of vogue from what I've seen). Also east and west have both fetishised children and childlike features in women and girls since time immemorial, but it's currently unfashionable to admit it in the west, especially America, and so while the real beauty standards shown in celebrities and those known for their beautiful faces still reflect that, in our art and entertainment media there are loads of manfaces. "Feminine" traits and "juvenile" traits are practically synonymous, as mankind has bred neoteny into our women probably since the dawn of agriculture gave men options of who to fuck beyond their manfaced sisters who would stop being attractive around age 16. Many people when observing beauty standards make the mistake of looking at cultural trends in self-expression rather than at the kinds of people others rate highly in terms of beauty or that are known for their beauty; as such I've seen people doomposting that western beauty standards are drag queens with tattoos and piercings and shit, but I really think it's a tiny minority that finds those things attractive even though tattoos especially are becoming ubiquitous.