/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>7178423
Beethoven is considered a genius, not merely talented (like you eventually said). The other skilled dudes no on one remembers may very well have been talented.
I think it's strange how badly /ic/ needs talent to not be real. It's obviously a nebulous term that encompasses several variables, but it does appear that some individuals are naturally inclined towards certain skills, it isn't all explainable by dick-shriveling grind and grit. Like there are anons who think anyone has the potential to draw like KJG if they do everything right (never mind that doing everything right requires being naturally obsessed with drawing from a young age) - it's a fucking irritating level of delusion cooked up in the feverish imagination of no-draws, yes I'm going to shit on that. These people never get anywhere and quit less than a year in, because they're simply not living in reality and don't understand what drawing and art are really about.
But so what? Is that the universal standard? Do your best. You don't have to reach the moon to get something out of art.

>>6863586
>>6863588
>a bunch of reddit /beg/s complaining about pad sensitivity means it's working "wrong"
You can test this right now. Set the stabilizer to 0 and make a quick slashing mark in the desired direction. It'll come out as a clean line, almost as if stabilizer had been applied.
The reason this NORMALLY doesn't happen is because your strokes are much slower than a slashing motion, and the tablet is correctly reading all your Parkinson's-tier inputs - because you're a human and not a robot. This isn't really an issue for artists who understand lines don't need to be literally flawless to make a good drawing, and that you won't be viewing every line at 500% zoom in 4k resolution.