/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6955931
and how is it apples and oranges?
the AI is using images of apples to understand apples, the concept, and everything that makes up an apple visually.

i already disproved your point about it needing to work like a human a brain. that is just completely irrelevant since it doesn't need to work exactly like a human brain to do learning.
the important part is what the AI is doing, and IF IT IS learning or not.

to come back to my point in >>6955789:
if you have no right to stop a human from learning from freely viewable images, then you also don't have the right when the AI is using it in the same way.