/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3763201
>jimmy i was really involved in berkeley, if you worked for the left youd come away just as disillusioned you massive retard.
I did work for the "left." Played both sides. Worked on Obama 2008 at college. Partied with the Republicans I got to know a bunch after the election, got muh foot in the door with the Republican Party of muh state, then worked on a 2010 congressional campaign, spent a lot of that summer working to organize all of the black Republican congressional candidates to get money, before Michael Steele told muh candidate on the Fire Pelosi bus that they were directing so much money into suppression and it was so effective that there was no interest in dumping money on trying to promote black republicans. So I then spent most of 2011 just getting fucking paid to sit around in an office and slinging emails for the RNC and all their PACs and think tanks shit. Then I went back to the Obama campaign in 2012 but they didn't really trust me after they realized I had been an RNC/RPV guy.

Like I don't really think of the Democrats as "the left." Most everything Obama did was a conservative policy before he did it and "conservatives" called it socialism. Hillary Clinton was a boring, corporate centrist.

But that doesn't mean that "it's all the same." In my experience, almost everyone that volunteers and works for the democrats does so because they have the best intent for what they think will make the country and the future better. When I worked with Republicans, it was a much more cynical, toxic mindset. So many of the people I worked with were literally only into politics for the money and opportunities. Every fucking thing Republicans do is a goddamn racket. Let's make some yard signs: create an LCC, transfer $15,000 from the PAC account to LCC, hire a signmaker to make signs for $900. There isn't anything that I did in Republican politics that wasn't a scheme. The election-industrial complex is real as fuck.

>>3728127
why r u so upset lol

>>3716062
>first of all lets make it clear that the context here is you talking about free will and entropy when your project is about painting memes by numbers.
cry more bb. Stay triggered dipshit.
>everything you've said the last 5 posts sounds ridiculously inflated in this context.
perfect. I'm a fucking clown you uppity nitwit. Le goofy meme artist screaming about entropy and quantum suicide is the joke!
>I have given you a pretty clear explanation of my idea of entropy.
Yeah you more or less articulated what it is >>3715414, other than the whole stagnation thing. Like entropy increases or decreases, I don't get the obsession with "stagnation."
>you are just rambling pathetic attempts at "science speak".
Not really m8. There's a lot more "science speak" that we can dive into. Not to mention philosophy speak. We're talking about "how to paint entropy." How would you do this?

>>3716083
It's nothing that a good pair of bolt cutters cant fix.

>>3593366
tl;dr:
>Nobody will mind when you're dead. Your parents will tuck your little ding dong in your pants and take the belt off your neck and just be glad that at least you didn't shoot up your middle school.

>>3574244
>Hey jimmy
hello
>summers almost over ;)
k. I'm not a tween. Been done with school for like 8 years. I don't really give a shit. Went to the beach once this summer.