/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3634932
I do, yes.
I'm unsure if it's just an analyzing thread, but I think it's appropriate to at least give Anons the option to critique another user's work, as well. I posted this in the drawthread, but to briefly explain,

Things I've been addressing since this page:
>the flatness of the perspective
>any "jank" in anatomical structure, beyond what the art style permits
>the imbalanced linework, leading to messier compositions and distinguishing "grounds" (foreground, etc)

I've already gone through most of the lessons in Hampton's, supplementing it with Anatomy for Sculptors. If you have any recommendations on resources to improve the style, please let me know. Even just posting a picture and saying "like this" is more than enough, as I'm willing to do style studies, as well.

Thank you.

>>3648873
Actually, I've found a more appropriate thread to post it.
In response to >>3634932
Regardless, I said I'd post the previous page, so I will.

Things I've been addressing since this page:
>the flatness of the perspective
>any "jank" in anatomical structure, beyond what the art style permits
>the imbalanced linework, leading to messier compositions and distinguishing "grounds" (foreground, etc)

Any critique is welcome. As is any resources you'd recommend I take a look at.