/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Mbti, one of my favorite subjects
>>6937780
>>6938121
>>6938786
>>6938685
Look at all these little midwits unable to comprehend the genius of mbti.
>a quick little google search blah blah blah
AHAHAHA, faggot that appeals to the authority of a google search out of all places instead of actually reading what it’s about. You’re a faggot who probably got ISFP or ISTP as its test result because you reek of lower Ne and lower intelligence as well.
>>6937734
It depends what art form each personality type uses, it’s probably like this:
INTP: Good at autistic shit like pixel art, manga, furry shit, porn, hardcore audio engineering, porn art, etc
ENTP: Good at pretentious art, can have the technical skill to be good, like how picasso or Salvador Dali was
ISFJ: Good at landscape art or generic artsy craft stuff. Not really good on a technical level unless they apply themselves. Mostly just Pinterest type art.
ESFJ: Insta/Pinterest level of drawing at best. Cannot produce more sophisticated stuff
INFJ: Can become great in just about any art form, more suited towards impressionistic type art where a subject is hardly the focus
ENFJ: Not suited to art at all. Singing and acting is their best attribute
ISTP: Autistic like INTP, but lesser in creativity subjects. Will just have one main area of being good at, and their art will tend to be really sterile in its making, very technically good, just kinda boring.
ESTP: Not suited well to art. Will probably be a subject photographer with models and other shit at most. Only really good at shit like acting or unsophisticated modern music.
INFP: Hyper autistic in just about every aspect like INTP. If they have talent, they can be very good in all art forms. Their downfall is that they just cannot apply themselves and they fail to notice technical shit and rely solely on how they feel that given day. Most of them are deviantart tier artists.